When the Loudest Voices Against Estrangement Are the Ones Who Need to Listen Most
A therapist's perspective on family cutoffs, projection, and the real reasons people walk away
By Lindsay Burns, LPC | Online Therapist for Women in Texas, South Carolina, Washington & Florida
There's a pattern I've noticed over years of clinical practice as well as observing the response to familial estrangement in the media (particularly social media) and once you see it, you can’t unsee it.
Scroll through any comment section where familial estrangement is discussed. Pay attention to who gets the most emotionally activated, who turns it into a moral crusade, and who simply cannot let it go.
It’s rarely people with a secure relational mentality, it is almost always littered with vague moralistic phrases like “family over everything” and statements that equate relationship with obligation.
The Reaction That Reveals More Than It Intends
People with secure, healthy relational dynamics tend to respond to news of someone else's estrangement with curiosity, understanding, and empathy. They wish that person greater peace and wish they didn’t have to go through the emotional turmoil. They do not have any personal emotions about it because it has nothing to do with them.
However, there's another kind of response, it's the person who becomes disproportionately outraged; who insists the estranged adult is selfish, mentally ill, brainwashed, ungrateful, or under the influence of a manipulative partner/therapist/etc. These folks will often make sweeping proclamations about how "family is everything" or "you'll regret it when they're gone." They may even try to get involved by lobbying mutual connections, sending guilt-laden messages, and treating another person's private decision about their own life as a personal affront.
This reaction is not only informative, but highly revealing.
In clinical terms, what's often happening here is a combination of two defense mechanisms: projection and reaction formation.
Projection is when someone takes a feeling or impulse they can't tolerate seeing in themselves and locates it in someone else instead. A parent who has never apologized to their own adult child might insist that other estranged adult children are simply ungrateful and unwilling to forgive. They're not actually talking about those strangers. They're describing a dynamic they recognize, just with the roles assigned to someone else.
Reaction formation works a little differently. Instead of relocating the feeling onto someone else, the person flips it and performs the opposite. Someone who privately worries they've been controlling, dismissive, or unkind to people in their own life may become the loudest, most emphatic defender of family loyalty you've ever met. The intensity is the giveaway. It's not really conviction. It's overcorrection, a way of drowning out an uncomfortable possibility before it can be heard, even by themselves (Baumeister, Dale, & Sommer, 1998).
People who have genuinely loving, reciprocal, emotionally safe family relationships do not feel personally threatened by someone else's choice to distance themself from their own family. They don't need to, their relationships speak for themselves.
Dog Whistling in Disguise
There's a term worth borrowing from political discourse here: dog whistling, a coded signal sent at a frequency that only certain listeners fully register.
When someone publicly rails against estrangement ("Children who cut off their parents are selfish and ungrateful"), they're sending a message to the people around them: Don't you dare. My behavior is beyond questioning.
They're also doing something subtler; by establishing estrangement as morally indefensible in the eyes of their community, they're preemptively discrediting anyone who might someday enforce a limit with them. If a family member later steps back, the narrative is already in place.
It's worth noticing not just what someone says about estrangement, but how personally they seem to take it. A stranger's private family decision should not generate this level of rage in a secure person. When it does, that's worth noting.
What Estrangement Actually Is (And What It Isn't)
Let’s set the rhetoric aside and look at what research actually tells us.
Karl Pillemer, a professor of human development at Cornell University, conducted the first large-scale national survey on family estrangement as part of the Cornell Family Estrangement and Reconciliation Project, published in 2020. Surveying over 1,300 Americans, he found that 27% reported a current estrangement from a family member, which translates to roughly 67 to 68 million people nationwide. He noted in the Cornell Chronicle that he was "absolutely stunned" by the finding, and that estrangement was "a very widespread problem hiding in plain sight."
A 2015 study conducted by Dr. Lucy Blake of the Centre for Family Research at the University of Cambridge, in collaboration with Stand Alone charity, surveyed 807 people who identified as estranged from a family member. Among adult children, the factors most commonly cited as leading to estrangement were emotional abuse, differences in values, and mental illness or substance use on the part of the parent. Blake later noted in a 2024 American Psychological Association piece that "families have always been complicated, and now we're talking about it more." So, let this data debunk the narrative that familial estrangement is a “trend.”
Here is what drives people to estrangement, according to both this research and what my clients describe in therapy:
Abuse. Physical, emotional, sexual, or psychological harm is one of the most commonly cited reasons adults distance from parents or siblings. Not perceived slights, but pattern-based harm that shaped their development and, in many cases, still affects how their nervous system functions today.
Chronic boundary violations. Refusal to respect a person's autonomy, partner, parenting choices, career, identity, or need for privacy, repeated and unrelenting across years or decades.
Conditional love. Affection and acceptance contingent on compliance, performance, or adherence to the family's preferred version of who you're supposed to be.
Untreated mental illness or addiction. Living in proximity to a parent or sibling whose unmanaged illness creates chaos and harm, and who refuses help, is genuinely dangerous to a person's long-term wellbeing.
Triangulation and enmeshment. Being pulled into parental conflicts, used as an emotional surrogate, or positioned as a go-between in a family system where dysfunction has become structural.
Identity invalidation. LGBTQ+ adults whose families refuse to acknowledge and affirm who they are. Adults from religious backgrounds whose evolving beliefs are treated as a betrayal. People whose career, partner, or lifestyle is not accepted and openly denigrated.
What estrangement is almost never about: being spoiled, having a therapist who encouraged it, being "too sensitive," or falling under the influence of a new partner who convinced someone to withdraw from their family. These narratives are most useful to people who want to avoid accountability.
The Myth of the Manipulated Adult Child
One of the most common dismissals leveled at estranged adults is that they were influenced into it, by a spouse, a therapist, a self-help book, or increasingly, a podcast or social media account.
This is almost always a deflection.
Healthy, autonomous adults don't cut off family because someone told them to. Good therapy is not in the practice of prescribing estrangement. What therapy does is help people identify patterns, name dynamics that had no language before, and give themselves permission to trust their own experience. If someone goes through that process and concludes estrangement is the right choice for them, the therapy didn't manufacture that conclusion; it helped them identify and articulate something they had been carrying for a long time, often for decades. The client retains their full autonomy to make their own choices with this newfound insight.
The idea that adult children are passive and easily swayed into “abandoning” their families is not just clinically inaccurate, but it removes agency from the exact person whose autonomy is supposedly being defended. It treats the estranged adult as someone who can't think for themselves, which reveals more about how the person arguing this actually views the adult child than anything else. A reality I commonly see in my own practice is that a parent of an adult child who goes no contact will often try to blame others for swaying them or taking their autonomy, when the reality is that the child is engaging in their own autonomy for the first time and the parent is resentful that the child is no longer under their influence. And a note on adult children being accused of “abandoning” their families; abandonment implies helplessness and dependence, which is not the case in an adult familial relationship. Relationships require mutual agreement in adulthood, no one is entitled to another person's time or presence without ongoing, mutual consent.
One caveat here; this is not to say that it is never possible an adult child is being manipulated, but it is not the most common reason adult children choose to estrange themselves from family members. There are cases of narcissistic abuse that happen, but this is not a common or automatic conclusion to jump to and would require much more in depth knowledge of the patterns and dynamics at play, best explored with a professional.
What Reconciliation Actually Requires
Estrangement is rarely something adults arrive at lightly or impulsively. In my experience as a counselor, and in the research, most people who step back from family do so after years, sometimes decades, of trying to maintain the relationship with proper boundaries and open communication. They had conversations, they set limits, and watched them be ignored. They often spent years hoping things would shift. Estrangement tends to be the last resort.
Reconciliation is possible, and when it happens authentically it can be genuinely meaningful. But I want to be clear about what I've seen actually make it possible.
The majority of adult children I work with are navigating relationships with parents or family members who are emotionally immature or show traits consistent with narcissistic patterns. These are not people engaged in a mutual conflict where both sides played a role and both sides can do the work of repair. They are family members who are not interested in an equitable adult relationship. They are willing to have a relationship, but only on their terms, which almost always requires the adult child to forfeit their autonomy, their perceptions, and their right to set any limits in order to participate. When the adult child tries to establish something self-protective, it gets experienced by the parent as aggression or abandonment.
That dynamic does not leave much room for reconciliation. Not because the adult child is unwilling, but because reconciliation requires two people, and one of them isn't showing up.
The families I've seen find their way back to each other share something in common: the family member that the adult child estranged themself from was willing to take real accountability and to respect the adult child's autonomy. This doesn't mean a perfect relationship. Many families land somewhere limited but livable, a relationship with clearer boundaries and expectations. That is a real and sometimes hard-won outcome worth having. A big part of this work is grief work, letting go of the ideal relationship, and accepting the one that is possible.
What it cannot be built on is one person continuing to ask the other to forego their individual needs and boundaries. That isn't reconciliation. It's a continuation of the same harmful dynamic.
Not: "I'm sorry you felt hurt." Not: "I did my best." Not: "You need to soften your heart and forgive."
Real reconciliation requires the willingness to hear what the other person experienced, without defending, minimizing, or making it about yourself, and then to actually change behavior rather than just express regret. For some families, going through that process leads somewhere real and lasting. For others, the inability to take that step ends up being the final confirmation of why the distance became necessary in the first place.
A Note to Those Who Are Angry at This Post
If you read this and felt a surge of defensiveness, if your instinct was to immediately catalog all the ways this doesn't apply to your family, or to list the reasons your estranged relative is the real problem, I'd gently invite you to sit with that reaction and examine it.
Discomfort in response to an idea isn't evidence the idea is wrong, but an invitation to build self-awareness around our own vulnerabilities and emotional responses.
The families where no one would ever seriously consider estrangement tend not to need to announce that. The security shows up in how they treat each other, not in making declarative statements about the importance of family or the morality of estrangement.
If you find yourself working very hard to establish that estrangement is always a moral failure and always someone else's fault, it might be worth asking, quietly and honestly: Who am I really trying to convince?
This post is written from a clinical perspective for educational purposes only and does not constitute individual therapeutic advice. If you are navigating family estrangement, working with a licensed therapist can provide support that is tailored to your specific situation.
If You are Looking to Process Your Own Family Estrangement
If reading this mirrored your own experience as an adult struggling with complexities of familial estrangement, you don’t have to face this alone.
The attachment wounds and grief involved are profound, and I help clients everyday to process these wounds and build peaceful, meaningful lives while navigating the changing desires or circumstances of complicated family dynamics.
I work with women navigating complicated family dynamics, dealing with emotionally immature or narcissistic parents, and healing anxious attachment. I offer online therapy in Texas, South Carolina, Washington, and Florida.
References
Baumeister, R. F., Dale, K., & Sommer, K. L. (1998). Freudian defense mechanisms and empirical findings in modern social psychology: Reaction formation, projection, displacement, undoing, isolation, sublimation, and denial. Journal of Personality, 66(6), 1081–1124. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00043
Pillemer, K. (2020a). Fault lines: Fractured families and how to mend them. Avery/Penguin Random House.
Pillemer, K. (2020, September 16). Family estrangement a problem "hiding in plain sight." Cornell Chronicle.https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2020/09/pillemer-family-estrangement-problem-hiding-plain-sight
Blake, L., Bland, B., & Golombok, S. (2015). Hidden voices: Family estrangement in adulthood. Stand Alone & Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge. https://www.standalone.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/HiddenVoices.FinalReport.pdf
Blake, L. (2024, April). Coping with family estrangement. APA Monitor on Psychology. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2024/04/healing-pain-estrangement
Lindsay Burns is a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC) specializing in attachment-based therapy for women. She works with clients online across Texas, South Carolina, Washington, and Florida.
Learn more about my specialties:
